Remarks on the Lexicographical Treatment of Metaforms

William Frawley

Abstract


This paper examines the way dictionaries describe metaforms, items that refer to the linguistic system itself (e.g., pronouns and indexicals). The paper first shows the inconsistent grammatical classification of metaforms, which are usually and incorrectly categorized as adverbs, conjunctions, prepositions, or interjections. It is then argued that metaforms should be classified in their currently known grammatical categories: discourse marker (<i>now</i>), focus particle (<i>even, like</i>), quotative (<i>like</i>), and so on. Discussion then turns to the definitions of metaforms, with illustration of their incorrect or misleading semantic characterization and suggestions for capturing their denotations consistently. This examination of the lexicography of metaforms is ultimately a case study in how dictionary making might be informed by judicious use of current grammatical, semantic, and pragmatic theory.

Keywords


adverb, complementizer, conjunction, definition, discourse marker, <i>even</i>, focus particle, form class, indexicals, interjection, <i>just</i>, lexicography, <i>like</i>, metaforms, now, part of speech, preposition, quotative, <i>then</i>, usage

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5788/6-1-1022

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2224-0039 (online); ISSN 1684-4904 (print)

Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0


Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2011.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help